| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 329.72 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O presente estudo parteda criação do Direito enquanto campo autónomo da praxise busca questionar seé a linguagem jurídica que permite a autonomização deste campo ou se é uma qualquer pulsão específica que marca este processo. A resposta a este primeiro questionamento abrirá a porta para a compreensão do desenvolvimento da linguagem jurídica como consequência de um específico modo de ser do Direito. É em consequência deumsentidoautónomo que o Direito requer um afinamento dos recortes factuais (casos) e opera uma específica forma de tratamento destes (para serem passíveis duma estabilização sistemática). Uma análise semiótica das consequências destas exigências permite a compreensão da constante densificação do discurso jurídico, resultando no distanciamento deste dos demais discursos práticos.Deste modo,a linguagem jurídicaapresenta-se como o outro lado da moeda do Direito. Isto é, esta não se desenvolve (atribuindo novos significados à significantes que –namaioria das vezes –jáexistem) apenas para cumprir o desiderato de uma aristocratizante diferenciação; a linguagem jurídica molda-se à complexidade (essencialmente qualitativa) dos problemas jurídicos que emergem no seioda praxis e às dificuldades de se estabilizar as respostas destes problemas num todo congruente.
The present study starts from the creation of Law as an autonomous field of praxisand seeks to question whether legal language is what allows the above-mentioned autonomisation or if there is some specific pulse that guidesthis process.The answer to this first question will open the door to our understanding of the development of legal language as a consequence oftheLaw’s specific way of being. It is a result of an autonomous meaning/direction(sentido) that law requires a refining of social facts (reframing then as cases) and has a specific way of treating them (so they can be systematically stabilised). A semiotic analysis of the consequences of these demands makes it possible to understand the constant densification of legal discourse which results in its distancing from other practical discourses.Legal language emerges, therefore, as the other side of the coin of Law itself. In other words, it doesn't develop itself (assigning new meanings to signifiers that –moreoften than not –alreadyexist) just to fulfil the desire for an aristocratic differentiation; legal language is sculpted according to the (essentially qualitative) complexity of the legal problems that emerge within praxisand the difficulties of stabilising the answers to these problems into a congruent whole.
The present study starts from the creation of Law as an autonomous field of praxisand seeks to question whether legal language is what allows the above-mentioned autonomisation or if there is some specific pulse that guidesthis process.The answer to this first question will open the door to our understanding of the development of legal language as a consequence oftheLaw’s specific way of being. It is a result of an autonomous meaning/direction(sentido) that law requires a refining of social facts (reframing then as cases) and has a specific way of treating them (so they can be systematically stabilised). A semiotic analysis of the consequences of these demands makes it possible to understand the constant densification of legal discourse which results in its distancing from other practical discourses.Legal language emerges, therefore, as the other side of the coin of Law itself. In other words, it doesn't develop itself (assigning new meanings to signifiers that –moreoften than not –alreadyexist) just to fulfil the desire for an aristocratic differentiation; legal language is sculpted according to the (essentially qualitative) complexity of the legal problems that emerge within praxisand the difficulties of stabilising the answers to these problems into a congruent whole.
Description
Keywords
Linguagem jurídica Jurisprudencialismo Semiótica jurídica Autonomia do direito Legal language Jurisprudencialism Legal semiotics Autonomyof the law
Citation
Publisher
Instituto Superior de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto