| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.08 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A importância do desenvolvimento sustentável e as preocupações com o planeta, essencialmente a nível
ambiental, são algumas das razões pelos quais, é necessário desenvolver mecanismos capazes de amenizar os impactos causados pelo setor da construção, já que esse é um dos responsáveis pelo impacto ambiental negativo no nosso planeta. Foi realizado um caso de estudo de uma residência unifamiliar, supondo a reabilitação do pavimento (piso/laje) dessa construção. Para isso foi elaborado um comparativo entre os métodos construtivos de concreto armado e madeira, com base nas variáveis de custo, energia e emissão de CO2, analisado qual o método estudado é mais sustentável para solução. Após a revisão bibliográfica, o levantamento dos dados e o comparativo, conclui-se que a construção em concreto armado é mais econômica em comparação com a estrutura de madeira, entretanto o método construtivo em madeira é mais eficiente em termos sustentáveis do que a estrutura de concreto armado.
The importance of sustainable development and concerns about the planet, essentially at an environmental level, are some of the reasons why it is necessary to develop mechanisms capable of mitigating the impacts caused by the construction sector, as this is one of those responsible for the negative environmental impact. on our planet. A case study of a single-family residence was carried out, assuming the rehabilitation of the pavement (floor/slab) of this construction. To this end, a comparison was drawn up between the construction methods of reinforced concrete and wood, based on the variables of cost, energy and CO2 emissions, analyzing which method studied is more sustainable for the solution. After the literature review, data collection and comparison, it is concluded that reinforced concrete construction is more economical compared to the wooden structure, however the wooden construction method is more efficient in sustainable terms than the wooden structure reinforced concrete.
The importance of sustainable development and concerns about the planet, essentially at an environmental level, are some of the reasons why it is necessary to develop mechanisms capable of mitigating the impacts caused by the construction sector, as this is one of those responsible for the negative environmental impact. on our planet. A case study of a single-family residence was carried out, assuming the rehabilitation of the pavement (floor/slab) of this construction. To this end, a comparison was drawn up between the construction methods of reinforced concrete and wood, based on the variables of cost, energy and CO2 emissions, analyzing which method studied is more sustainable for the solution. After the literature review, data collection and comparison, it is concluded that reinforced concrete construction is more economical compared to the wooden structure, however the wooden construction method is more efficient in sustainable terms than the wooden structure reinforced concrete.
Description
Keywords
Keywords: Sustainability Rehabilitation Sustainable Development Energy CO2 Emissions Reabilitação Sustentabilidade Energia Desenvolvimento Sustentável Emissões CO2