| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.12 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A avaliação de riscos para além de uma obrigatoriedade legal para as empresas, é uma das ferramentas do sistema de gestão de segurança mais importante, pois permite-nos planear e organizar a prevenção de segurança de forma a evitar a ocorrência de acidentes de trabalho e doenças profissionais. Este trabalho foi desenvolvido para o setor da metalomecânica e foi tido como orientação o processo produtivo de uma empresa desse setor. O objetivo principal desta dissertação era analisar e avaliar a eficácia de diferentes metodologias na avaliação de riscos aplicadas ao setor metalomecânico. Para isso, foram escolhidos 3 métodos de avaliação semi-quantitativos: NTP 330, William T. Fine e MIAR. Constatou-se que todos os métodos apresentam aspetos positivos e negativos, não existindo um método perfeito. E ambos apresentam bons resultados na valoração do risco. Mas, no que concerne ao objetivo principal desta dissertação, ficou concluído que o Método William T. Fine destaca-se por ser mais objetivo e mais assertivo, demonstrando uma correta priorização dos riscos, distinguindo os riscos mais urgentes dos não urgentes, mas sem causar falsos níveis de segurança.
Risk assessment is a legal obligation for companies and is one of the most important tools of the safety management system, because allows us to plan and organize safety prevention to avoid the occurrence of occupational accidents and diseases. This work was developed for the Metallomechanical sector and was considered as guidance the production process of a company in this sector. The main objective of this dissertation was to analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of different methodologies in the risk assessment applied to the Metallomechanical sector. For this, three semi-quantitative methods were chosen: NTP 330, William T. Fine and MIAR. It was concluded that all methods have positive and negative aspects, and there is no perfect method. And both have good results in risk assessment. However, with regard to the main objective of this dissertation, it was concluded that the William T. Fine Method stands out for being more objective and more assertive, demonstrating a correct prioritization of risks, distinguishing the most urgent risks from non-urgent ones, but without causing false security levels.
Risk assessment is a legal obligation for companies and is one of the most important tools of the safety management system, because allows us to plan and organize safety prevention to avoid the occurrence of occupational accidents and diseases. This work was developed for the Metallomechanical sector and was considered as guidance the production process of a company in this sector. The main objective of this dissertation was to analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of different methodologies in the risk assessment applied to the Metallomechanical sector. For this, three semi-quantitative methods were chosen: NTP 330, William T. Fine and MIAR. It was concluded that all methods have positive and negative aspects, and there is no perfect method. And both have good results in risk assessment. However, with regard to the main objective of this dissertation, it was concluded that the William T. Fine Method stands out for being more objective and more assertive, demonstrating a correct prioritization of risks, distinguishing the most urgent risks from non-urgent ones, but without causing false security levels.
Description
Keywords
Avaliação de riscos Método NTP 330 Método William T. Fine Método MIAR Risk assessment NTP 330 Method William T. Fine Method MIAR Method