| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.36 MB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
The current meta-analysis included 431 records (N= 123,414) to comprehensively explore the complex interaction between psychopathy, antisocial behavior, and empathy. First, empathy domains (cognitive and affective) were used to provide critical insights for distinguishing antisocial behavior from psychopathy. Cognitive empathy was more impaired in antisocial groups (gcognitive= -.40; gaffective= -.11), while high psychopathy samples displayed larger deficits in affective empathy (gaffective= -.44; gcognitive= -.23), although this dissociation was not clear in correlational analyses. Secondly, the specific associations between empathy domains and psychopathy dimensions were evaluated. Psychopathy traits closely related to antisocial behavior were mildly associated with both empathy domains (r= -.07 to -.14). Callous-affective traits were largely associated with affective empathy (r= -.32 to -.35) and moderately correlated to cognitive empathy (r= -.26). Diverging results were found for the interpersonal dimension, as boldness-adaptive manifestations were unrelated to cognitive empathy (r= .05), while non-adaptive interpersonal traits were negatively associated with both empathy domains (rcognitive= -.14; raffective= -.25). Overall, these findings suggest that: (1) psychopathy and antisocial behavior display distinct empathic profiles; (2) psychopathy dimensions are differentially associated with cognitive and affective empathy; (3) the interaction between interpersonal traits and empathic processes is different across the conceptual models of psychopathy.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Psychopathy Personality Antisocial Empathy Theory of mind Affective sharing
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Campos, C., Pasion, R., Azeredo, A. A. C., Ramião, E., Mazer, P., Macedo, I., & Barbosa, F. (2022, June). Refining the link between psychopathy, antisocial behavior, and empathy: a meta-analytical approach across different conceptual frameworks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102145
Editora
Elsevier