Strategic Project - UI 645 - 2011-2012

Funder

Organizational Unit

Publications

Diffusion-weighted imaging: determination of the best pair ofb-values to discriminate breast lesions

Publication . Nogueira, Luisa; Brandão, S; Matos, E; Nunes, R G; Loureiro, J; Ferreira, H A; Ramos, I

In breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is used to discriminate between malignant and benign lesions. As ADC estimates can be affected by the weighting factors, our goal was to determine the optimal pair of b-values for discriminating breast lesions at 3.0 T. METHODS: 152 females with 157 lesions (89 malignant and 68 benign) underwent breast MRI, including a DWI sequence sampling six b-values 50, 200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 s mm−2. ADC values were computed from different pairs of b-values and compared with ADC obtained by fitting the six b-values using a mono-exponential diffusion model (ADCall). Cut-off ADC values were determined and diagnostic performance evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis using Youden statistics. Mean ADCs were determined for normal tissue and lesions. Differences were evaluated by lesion and histological types. RESULTS: Considering the cut-off values 1.46 and 1.49 × 103mm2 s−1, the pairs 50, 1000 and 200, 800 s mm−2 showed the highest accuracy, 77.5% and 75.4% with areas under the curve 84.4% and 84.2%, respectively. The best pair for ADC quantification was 50, 1000 s mm−2 with 38/49 true-negative and 69/89 true-positive cases respectively; mean ADCs were 1.86 ± 0.46, 1.77 ± 0.37 and 1.15 ± 0.46 × 10−3 mm2 s−1 for normal, benign and malignant lesions. There were no significant differences in these ADC values when compared with ADCall (ADC calculated from the full set of b - values) [difference = 0.0075 × 10−3 mm2 s−1; confidence interval 95%: (−0.0036; 0.0186); p = 0.18]. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance in differentiating malignant and benign lesions was most accurate for the b-value pair 50, 1000 s mm−2.

2014Journal article

Open access

Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability

Publication . Nogueira, Luísa; Brandão, Sofia; Matos, Eduarda; Nunes, Rita Gouveia; Ferreira, Hugo Alexandre; Loureiro, Joana; Ramos, Isabel

PURPOSE We aimed to compare two different methods of region of interest (ROI) demarcation and determine interobserver variability on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in breast lesions. METHODS Thirty-two patients with 39 lesions were evaluated with a 3.0 Tesla scanner using a diffusion-weighted sequence with several b-values. Two observers independently performed the ADC measurements using: 1) a small fixed area of 10 mm2 ROI within the area with highest restriction; 2) a large ROI so as to include the whole lesion. Differences were assessed using the Wilcoxon-rank test. Bland-Altman method and Spearman coefficient were applied for interobserver variability and correlation analysis. RESULTS ADC values measured using the two ROI demarcation methods were significantly different for both observers (P = 0.026; P = 0.033). There was no interobserver variability in ADC values using either method (large ROI, P = 0.21; small ROI, P = 0.64). ADC values of malignant lesions were significantly different between the two methods (P < 0.001). Variability in ADC was ≤0.008×10−3 mm2/s for both methods. When using the same method, ADC values were significantly correlated between the observers (small ROI: r=0.990, P < 0.001; large ROI: r=0.985, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The choice of ROI demarcation method influences ADC measurements. Small ROIs show less overlap in ADC values and higher ADC reproducibility, suggesting that this method may improve lesion discrimination. Interobserver variability was low for both methods.

2015Journal article

Restricted access

Application of the diffusion kurtosis model for the study of breast lesions

Publication . Nogueira, Luísa; Brandão, Sofia; Matos, Eduarda; Nunes, Rita Gouveia; Loureiro, Joana; Ramos, Isabel; Ferreira, Hugo Alexandre

Objectives To evaluate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in the differentiation and characterisation of breast lesions. Methods Thirty-six women underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including a DWI sequence with multiple b-values (50–3,000 s/mm2). Mean values for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), mean diffusivity (MD) and mean kurtosis (MK) were calculated by lesion type and histological subtype. Differences and correlation between parameters were determined. Results Forty-four lesions were found. There were significant differences between benign and malignant lesions for all parameters (ADC, p = 0.017; MD, p = 0.028; MK, p = 0.017). ADC and MD were higher for benign (1.96 ± 0.41 × 10−3 and 2.17 ± 0.42 × 10−3 mm2/s, respectively) than for malignant lesions (1.33 ± 0.18 × 10−3 and 1.52 ± 0.50 × 10−3 mm2/s). MK was higher for malignant (0.61 ± 0.27) than benign lesions (0.37 ± 0.18). We found differences between invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and fibroadenoma (FA) for all parameters (ADC, MD and MK): p = 0.016, 0.022 and 0.016, respectively. FA and fibrocystic change (FC) showed differences only in MK (p = 0.016). Conclusions Diffusion in breast lesions follows a non-Gaussian distribution. MK enables differentiation and characterisation of breast lesions, providing new insights into microstructural complexity. To confirm these results, further investigation in a broader sample should be performed.

2014Journal article

Open access

Fat suppression techniques (STIR vs. SPAIR) on diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions at 3.0 T: preliminary experience

Publication . Brandão, Sofia; Nogueira, Luísa; Matos, Eduarda; Nunes, Rita Gouveia; Ferreira, Hugo Alexandre; Loureiro, Joana; Ramos, Isabel

Purpose The aim of this work was to perform a qualitative and quantitative comparison of the performance of two fat suppression techniques on breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Materials and methods Fifty-one women underwent clinical breast magnetic resonance imaging, including DWI with short TI inversion recovery (STIR) and spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR). Four were excluded from the analysis due to image artefacts. Rating of fat suppression uniformity and lesion visibility were performed. Agreement between the two sequences was evaluated. Additionally, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for normal gland, benign and malignant lesions were compared. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was also performed. Results From the 52 lesions found, 47 were detected by both sequences. DWI-STIR evidenced more homogeneous fat suppression (p = 0.03). Although these lesions were seen with both techniques, DWI-SPAIR evidenced higher score for lesion visibility in nine of them. SNR and CNR were comparable, except for SNR in benign lesions (p < 0.01), which was higher for DWI-SPAIR. Mean ADC values for lesions were similar. ADC for normal fibroglandular tissue was higher when using DWI-STIR (p = 0.006). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the curve values were alike: 84.0 % for both; 77.3, 71.4 %; 80.9, 78.3 %; 82.5, 81.3 % for DWI-SPAIR and DWI-STIR, respectively. Conclusion DWI-STIR showed superior fat suppression homogeneity. No differences were found for SNR and CNR, except for SNR in benign lesions. ADCs for lesions were comparable. Findings in this study are consistent with previous studies at 1.5 T, meaning that both fat suppression techniques are appropriate for breast DWI at 3.0 T.

2015Journal article

Open access

Breast DWI at 3 T: influence of the fat-suppression technique on image quality and diagnostic performance

Publication . Nogueira, Luisa; Brandão, Sofia; Nunes, Rita G.; Ferreira, Hugo Alexandre; Loureiro, Joana; Ramos, Isabel

Aim To evaluate two fat-suppression techniques: short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and spectral adiabatic inversion recovery (SPAIR) regarding image quality and diagnostic performance in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of breast lesions at 3 T. Materials and methods Ninety-two women (mean age 48 ± 12.1 years; range 21–78 years) underwent breast MRI. Two DWI pulse sequences, with b-values (50 and 1000 s/mm2) were performed with STIR and SPAIR. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), suppression homogeneity, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were quantitatively assessed for each technique. Values were compared between techniques and lesion type. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate lesion discrimination. Results One hundred and fourteen lesions were analysed (40 benign and 74 malignant). SNR and CNR were significantly higher for DWI-SPAIR; fat-suppression uniformity was better for DWI-STIR (p < 1 × 10−4). ADC values for benign and malignant lesions and normal tissue were 1.92 × 10−3, 1.18 × 10−3, 1.86 × 10−3 s/mm2 for DWI-STIR and 1.80 × 10−3, 1.11 × 10−3, 1.79 × 10−3 s/mm2 for SPAIR, respectively. Comparison between fat-suppression techniques showed significant differences in mean ADC values for benign (p = 0.013) and malignant lesions (p = 0.001). DWI-STIR and -SPAIR ADC cut-offs were 1.42 × 10−3 and 1.46 × 10−3 s/mm2, respectively. Diagnostic performance for DWI-STIR versus SPAIR was: accuracy (81.6 versus 83.3%), area under curve (87.7 versus 89.2%), sensitivity (79.7 versus 85.1%), and specificity (85 versus 80%). Positive predictive value was similar. Conclusion The fat-saturation technique used in the present study may influence image quality and ADC quantification. Nevertheless, STIR and SPAIR techniques showed similar diagnostic performances, and therefore, both are suitable for use in clinical practice.

2015Journal article

Open access