ESS - LRP - Artigos
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing ESS - LRP - Artigos by Author "Amaoui, Sofia"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- EEG signatures during pregnancy and their role on parenting-related measures: scoping reviewPublication . Braga, Patrícia Vilela; Amaoui, Sofia; Lamela, Diogo; Jongenelen, Inês; Costa, Raquel; Oliveira, Jorge; Pasion, Rita; Pinto, Tiago Miguel; Paiva, Tiago Oliveira; Campos, Carlos; Campos, CarlosThis scoping review aims to map and synthesise the current research evidence targeting the electroencephalography (EEG) neural correlates during pregnancy and its association with parenting-related measures during pregnancy and postpartum period. Pregnancy is characterised by a wide range of biological changes associated with adaptation to parenthood. A growing body of literature has examined the neural correlates of pregnancy using EEG, revealing distinct patterns in pregnant females, with these EEG metrics changing throughout gestation and postpartum. Due to the heterogeneity of the evidence, the current literature lacks an organised synthesis, making it difficult to understand the neural correlates during pregnancy and their association with parentingrelated measures during pregnancy and postpartum period. Studies will be included if they contain a quantitative EEG metric in their assessment in pregnant women. Studies will be included if they involve clinical or community samples. No sociodemographic, obstetric, or health exclusion criteria will be applied. The scoping review will be conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute’s (JBI) guidelines and will be reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Searches will be conducted in 7 databases (Cochrane for Trials and Reviews, PsycInfo, PubMed, Psychological and Behavioural Science Collection, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection) for articles published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish with no limitation on the region or publication time frame. Two independent reviewers will screen each record following a standardised flowchart using asreview lab. Data extraction will be performed by the two reviewers using charting tables in Excel. Disagreements at any step will be resolved via consensus or by a third reviewer. Results will be reported using tables and graphs along with a descriptive analysis, according to the research questions.