Repository logo
 
Publication

Ecological validity of neuropsychological interventions: A systematic review

dc.contributor.authorPinto, Joana O.
dc.contributor.authorPontes, Diogo
dc.contributor.authorPeixoto, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorDores, Artemisa R.
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-10T10:13:38Z
dc.date.available2024-04-10T10:13:38Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-08
dc.description.abstractThe concept of ecological validity (EV) in neuropsychological interventions (NI) has been consistently advocated, but there is a lack of reviews focused on how EV is operationalized in NI programmes. This review aims to address this gap by exploring the outcome measures more commonly used for assessing EV and to understand the main characteristics of programmes with good EV. A literature search was conducted to identify studies that examined the EV of NI programmes, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines. A total of twenty-seven studies were included in this review. Among these, only three studies explicitly described the procedures used to assess EV. Additionally, almost half of the studies assumed that interventions had good EV based on the characteristics of the programmes. The inconsistent assessment of EV of NI programmes prevented the identification of specific characteristics of programmes demonstrating good EV. This systematic review reveals a significant gap in the literature concerning the operationalization of EV within the field of NI. Further research is required to establish a consistent definition of EV in the context of NI and to develop criteria for its effective operationalization.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationPinto, J. O., Pontes, D., Peixoto, B., Dores, A. R., & Barbosa, F. (2024). Ecological validity of neuropsychological interventions: A systematic review. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2328694pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23279095.2024.2328694pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/25331
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherRoutledge Taylor and Francis Grouppt_PT
dc.relationArtemisa Dores is a researcher of School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal, supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia [Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology] through R&D Units funding (UIDB/05210/2020).pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23279095.2024.2328694pt_PT
dc.subjectEcological validitypt_PT
dc.subjectNeuropsychological interventionpt_PT
dc.subjectSystematic reviewpt_PT
dc.subjectPRISMApt_PT
dc.titleEcological validity of neuropsychological interventions: A systematic reviewpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage20pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleApplied Neuropsychology: Adultpt_PT
person.familyNamePinto
person.familyNameDores
person.givenNameJoana O
person.givenNameArtemisa
person.identifier.ciencia-id431A-BDD1-63C2
person.identifier.ciencia-id6B12-301B-4A0F
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0643-8439
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4595-9816
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9f253dfa-a8af-4aed-8258-8700464adcf1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6579b160-3747-4ab2-a590-9f7d03215fa7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6579b160-3747-4ab2-a590-9f7d03215fa7

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ART_Joana O. Pinto.pdf
Size:
1.99 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: