| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.43 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A regula(menta)ção das Instituições Particulares de Solidariedade Social (IPSS) que atuam na área da saúde é um tema que motiva múltiplos e intensos debates.
A pandemia da COVID-19 que nos assola(ou) presentemente, (re)lançou o debate sobre a (des)necessidade de uma revisão da regula(menta)ção em vigor para as organizações da economia social que atuam na área da saúde em Portugal.
Este estudo visa compreender a (des)adequação da regula(menta)ção estipulada para as IPSS que disponibilizam respostas sociais na área da saúde e identificar as influências da regula(menta)ção nos serviços disponibilizados pelas IPSS que oferecem respostas na área da saúde.
O estudo empírico foi desenvolvido através da metodologia qualitativa, recorrendo-se à análise de conteúdo de entrevistas realizadas a sete IPSS.
Procurou-se, desta forma, auscultar as perceções dos gestores das IPSS e dar respostas às questões formuladas neste estudo.
A partir da pesquisa realizada é possível concluir que a regula(menta)ção não está totalmente (des)adequada à realidade das IPSS e há uma inflexibilidade que não acompanha a realidade de muitas organizações.
Por outro lado, constatou-se que a posição das IPSS converge relativamente às (in)compatibilidades na persecução dos fins das IPSS e que a atuação fragmentada das entidades reguladoras, na sua generalidade, se mostra adequada, embora sejam identificáveis algumas lacunas.
O estudo permitiu, deste modo, compreender as perceções dos gestores das IPSS em matéria de regula(menta)ção e identificar práticas que possam contribuir para uma regula(menta)ção mais adequada à realidade e ao perfil das IPSS que atuam na área da saúde.
The regulation of Private Social Solidarity Institutions (IPSS) that work in the health area is a topic that motivates multiple and intense debates. The COVID-19 pandemic that is currently plaguing us (or) has (re)launched the debate on the (un)need for a review of the regulation in force for social economy organizations working in the area of health in Portugal. This study aims to understand the (inadequacy) of the regulations stipulated for the IPSS that provide social responses in the health area and to identify the influences of the regulation on the services provided by the IPSS that offer answers in the health area. The empirical study was developed through qualitative methodology, using the content analysis of interviews carried out with seven IPSS. In this way, we sought to listen to the perceptions of IPSS managers and provide answers to the questions formulated in this study. From the research carried out, it is possible to conclude that the regulation is not totally (un)suitable to the reality of IPSS and there is an inflexibility that does not follow the reality of many organizations. On the other hand, it was found that the position of the IPSS converges in relation to the (in)compatibilities in the pursuit of the purposes of the IPSS and that the fragmented action of the regulatory authorities, in general, is adequate, although some gaps are identifiable. In this way, the study allowed us to understand the perceptions of IPSS managers in terms of regulation and to identify practices that can contribute to a regulation that is more adequate to the reality and profile of IPSS working in the health area.
The regulation of Private Social Solidarity Institutions (IPSS) that work in the health area is a topic that motivates multiple and intense debates. The COVID-19 pandemic that is currently plaguing us (or) has (re)launched the debate on the (un)need for a review of the regulation in force for social economy organizations working in the area of health in Portugal. This study aims to understand the (inadequacy) of the regulations stipulated for the IPSS that provide social responses in the health area and to identify the influences of the regulation on the services provided by the IPSS that offer answers in the health area. The empirical study was developed through qualitative methodology, using the content analysis of interviews carried out with seven IPSS. In this way, we sought to listen to the perceptions of IPSS managers and provide answers to the questions formulated in this study. From the research carried out, it is possible to conclude that the regulation is not totally (un)suitable to the reality of IPSS and there is an inflexibility that does not follow the reality of many organizations. On the other hand, it was found that the position of the IPSS converges in relation to the (in)compatibilities in the pursuit of the purposes of the IPSS and that the fragmented action of the regulatory authorities, in general, is adequate, although some gaps are identifiable. In this way, the study allowed us to understand the perceptions of IPSS managers in terms of regulation and to identify practices that can contribute to a regulation that is more adequate to the reality and profile of IPSS working in the health area.
Description
Keywords
Regula(menta)ção Saúde Instituições Particulares de Solidariedade Social (IPSS) Economia social Gestão Regulation Health Private Social Solidarity Institutions (PSSI) Social Economy Managemen