Repository logo
 
Publication

Ecological validity in neurocognitive assessment: Systematized review, content analysis, and proposal of an instrument

2023-02-08Journal article Restricted access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Joana O.
dc.contributor.authorDores, Artemisa Rocha
dc.contributor.authorPeixoto, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-10T10:32:10Z
dc.date.available2023-02-10T10:32:10Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-08
dc.description.abstractThe main objectives of this study are to identify the dimensions of Ecological Validity(EV) within the definitions of this concept, understand how they are operationalized in neurocog-nitive tests, and propose a checklist for EV attributes in neurocognitive tests. A systematized review was combined with content analysis of the selected papers, usingthe inductive method. We analyzed 82 studies on the EV of neurocognitive tests, 19 literaturereviews and 63 empirical studies. Based on this review, we identified the relevant criteria for evalu-ating EV. EV is a multidimensional concept with two main dimensions: representativeness and gen-eralization. Representativeness involves the subdimensions simplicity-complexity and artificial-nat-ural and several criteria organized on a continuum from low EV to high EV. Generalization isdependent on representativeness and is influenced by different cognitive and non-cognitive fac-tors. We propose six stages for operationalizing EV, from defining the objectives of the neurocog-nitive assessment to the methodology for scoring and interpreting the results.This systematized review helps to operationalize the concept of EV by providing atool for evaluating and improving EV while developing new tests. Further studies with a longitu-dinal design can compare the predictive value of tests with higher versus lower EV-checklistscores.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationPinto, J. O., Dores, A. R., Peixoto, B., & Barbosa, F. (2023). Ecological validity in neurocognitive assessment: Systematized review, content analysis, and proposal of an instrument. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2170800pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23279095.2023.2170800pt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn2327-9109
dc.identifier.issn2327-9095
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/22229
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherTaylor&Francis Onlinept_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23279095.2023.2170800pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectChecklistpt_PT
dc.subjectContent analysispt_PT
dc.subjectEcological validitypt_PT
dc.subjectNeurocognitive assessmentpt_PT
dc.subjectSystematized reviewpt_PT
dc.titleEcological validity in neurocognitive assessment: Systematized review, content analysis, and proposal of an instrumentpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage18pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleApplied Neuropsychology: Adult pt_PT
person.familyNamePinto
person.familyNameDores
person.givenNameJoana O
person.givenNameArtemisa
person.identifier.ciencia-id431A-BDD1-63C2
person.identifier.ciencia-id6B12-301B-4A0F
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0643-8439
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4595-9816
rcaap.rightsclosedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9f253dfa-a8af-4aed-8258-8700464adcf1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6579b160-3747-4ab2-a590-9f7d03215fa7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6579b160-3747-4ab2-a590-9f7d03215fa7

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ART_Joana O. Pinto.pdf
Size:
2.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

ESS - CSH - Artigos
ESS - CIR - Artigos