Repository logo
 
Publication

Microstructure, mechanical properties and chemical degradation of brazed AISI 316 stainless steel/alumina systems

dc.contributor.authorPaiva, O. C.
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Mário A.
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-06T10:57:05Z
dc.date.available2014-03-06T10:57:05Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractThe main aims of the present study are simultaneously to relate the brazing parameters with: (i) the correspondent interfacial microstructure, (ii) the resultant mechanical properties and (iii) the electrochemical degradation behaviour of AISI 316 stainless steel/alumina brazed joints. Filler metals on such as Ag–26.5Cu–3Ti and Ag–34.5Cu–1.5Ti were used to produce the joints. Three different brazing temperatures (850, 900 and 950 °C), keeping a constant holding time of 20 min, were tested. The objective was to understand the influence of the brazing temperature on the final microstructure and properties of the joints. The mechanical properties of the metal/ceramic (M/C) joints were assessed from bond strength tests carried out using a shear solicitation loading scheme. The fracture surfaces were studied both morphologically and structurally using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). The degradation behaviour of the M/C joints was assessed by means of electrochemical techniques. It was found that using a Ag–26.5Cu–3Ti brazing alloy and a brazing temperature of 850 °C, produces the best results in terms of bond strength, 234 ± 18 MPa. The mechanical properties obtained could be explained on the basis of the different compounds identified on the fracture surfaces by XRD. On the other hand, the use of the Ag–34.5Cu–1.5Ti brazing alloy and a brazing temperature of 850 °C produces the best results in terms of corrosion rates (lower corrosion current density), 0.76 ± 0.21 μA cm−2. Nevertheless, the joints produced at 850 °C using a Ag–26.5Cu–3Ti brazing alloy present the best compromise between mechanical properties and degradation behaviour, 234 ± 18 MPa and 1.26 ± 0.58 μA cm−2, respectively. The role of Ti diffusion is fundamental in terms of the final value achieved for the M/C bond strength. On the contrary, the Ag and Cu distribution along the brazed interface seem to play the most relevant role in the metal/ceramic joints electrochemical performance.por
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msea.2007.07.015pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn0921-5093
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4121
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherElsevierpor
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMaterials Science and Engineering: A; Vol. 480, Issue 1-2
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092150930701427Xpor
dc.subjectMetal/ceramic joiningpor
dc.subjectActive metal brazingpor
dc.subjectShear strengthpor
dc.subjectElectrochemical degradationpor
dc.subjectProcessing parameterspor
dc.subjectInterface compositionpor
dc.titleMicrostructure, mechanical properties and chemical degradation of brazed AISI 316 stainless steel/alumina systemspor
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage315por
oaire.citation.startPage306por
oaire.citation.titleMaterials Science and Engineering: Apor
oaire.citation.volume480por
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspor
rcaap.typearticlepor

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ART_OPaiva_2008_CIDEM.pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: