Repository logo
 
Publication

Modelling the Contribution of 40K, 232Th and 226Ra to Radiation Dose and Risk from Airborne Discharges of Coal-Fired Power Plants

dc.contributor.authorDinis, M. L.
dc.contributor.authorFiúza, António
dc.contributor.authorGóis, Joaquim
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, J. M. Valerio de
dc.contributor.authorMeira Castro, Ana C.
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-08T12:36:26Z
dc.date.available2015-01-08T12:36:26Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractCoal contains trace elements and naturally occurring radionuclides such as 40K, 232Th, 238U. When coal is burned, minerals, including most of the radionuclides, do not burn and concentrate in the ash several times in comparison with their content in coal. Usually, a small fraction of the fly ash produced (2-5%) is released into the atmosphere. The activities released depend on many factors (concentration in coal, ash content and inorganic matter of the coal, combustion temperature, ratio between bottom and fly ash, filtering system). Therefore, marked differences should be expected between the by-products produced and the amount of activity discharged (per unit of energy produced) from different coal-fired power plants. In fact, the effects of these releases on the environment due to ground deposition have been received some attention but the results from these studies are not unanimous and cannot be understood as a generic conclusion for all coal-fired power plants. In this study, the dispersion modelling of natural radionuclides was carried out to assess the impact of continuous atmospheric releases from a selected coal plant. The natural radioactivity of the coal and the fly ash were measured and the dispersion was modelled by a Gaussian plume estimating the activity concentration at different heights up to a distance of 20 km in several wind directions. External and internal doses (inhalation and ingestion) and the resulting risk were calculated for the population living within 20 km from the coal plant. In average, the effective dose is lower than the ICRP’s limit and the risk is lower than the U.S. EPA’s limit. Therefore, in this situation, the considered exposure does not pose any risk. However, when considering the dispersion in the prevailing wind direction, these values are significant due to an increase of 232Th and 226Ra concentrations in 75% and 44%, respectively.por
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/5354
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherSouth Pacific Environmental Radioactivity Associationpor
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSPERA 2014;
dc.titleModelling the Contribution of 40K, 232Th and 226Ra to Radiation Dose and Risk from Airborne Discharges of Coal-Fired Power Plantspor
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceSeptember 01-05, NT Darwin, Australiapor
oaire.citation.titleSPERA2014 - 13th South Pacific Environmental Radioactivity Association Conferencepor
person.familyNameMeira Castro
person.givenNameAna C.
person.identifier.ciencia-id4114-8077-FF55
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5579-6550
person.identifier.ridA-3027-2012
person.identifier.scopus-author-id37070861900
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspor
rcaap.typeconferenceObjectpor
relation.isAuthorOfPublication270998d3-93af-4186-a5cc-9045b6958d3b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery270998d3-93af-4186-a5cc-9045b6958d3b

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
COM12_AMC_2014.pdf
Size:
8.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: