Repository logo
 
Publication

Prevalence of the use of dosimeters for ionizing radiation from fluoroscopy − a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorVideira, Sara
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Matilde
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Joana
dc.contributor.authorGuedes, Joana
dc.contributor.authorMartins, João
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Manuela Vieira da
dc.contributor.authorVieira da Silva, Manuela
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Matilde
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-21T10:24:10Z
dc.date.available2025-10-21T10:24:10Z
dc.date.issued2025-08
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to assess the prevalence of individual dosimeter use among workers exposed to ionizing radiation during fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Additionally, factors contributing to its use were identified. Studies were identified through searches in five databases on 13 April 2024. Additionally, snowballing techniques were employed. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and the CoCoPop model. A narrative synthesis, bibliometric analysis, and meta-analysis were performed. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for prevalence studies. Fifty studies involving 11,067 individuals were included. Orthopedics/traumatology was the most studied specialty (46 %). Median use rates were: 24 %(IQR = 44 %) for eye lens dosimeters, 15 %(IQR = 13 %) for electronic real-time dosimeters, 27 %(IQR = 42 %) for wrist/finger dosimeters, 25 %(IQR = 23 %) for collar/ thyroid dosimeters and 5 % for ankle dosimeter; 15 %(IQR = 78 %) reported no monitoring device. In 15 studies (30 %) with 4,188 individuals (38 %), the overall prevalence of “always” using whole-body dosimeters was 43 % [95 %CI:24–62]. By continent, the highest prevalence was found in Africa (75 %[95 % CI: 46–95]), while the lowest was in the “Americas” (33 %[95 % CI: 16–52]). Significant moderator effects were found: higher prevalence in “Africa” (p = 0.04), “gastroenterology” (p = 0.04), and “involving radiology” (p = 0.01); lower in “orthopedics” (p = 0.01) and “physicians” (p = 0.03). No significant moderator effects were found: “very high Human Development Index” (p = 0.72) and “high Human Development Index” (p = 0.69). Studies showed moderate risk of bias (6/9), with little evidence of publication bias. Exposure doses may be underestimated due to the low prevalence of dosimeter use. Interventions targeting individual and organizational factors are needed to promote consistent use and improve safety.por
dc.identifier.citationVideira, S., Rodrigues, M., Santos, J., Guedes, J., Martins, J., & Vieira da Silva, M. (2025). Prevalence of the use of dosimeters for ionizing radiation from fluoroscopy − a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Physica Medica, 136, 105037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105037
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105037
dc.identifier.eissn1724-191X
dc.identifier.issn1120-1797
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/30666
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001474?via%3Dihub
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectHealthcare
dc.subjectInterventional
dc.subjectMonitoring device
dc.subjectOccupational
dc.subjectRadiation protection
dc.subjectSurgical X-radiation exposure
dc.titlePrevalence of the use of dosimeters for ionizing radiation from fluoroscopy − a systematic literature review and meta-analysispor
dc.typereview article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.titlePhysica Medica
oaire.citation.volume136
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
person.familyNameVieira da Silva
person.familyNameRodrigues
person.givenNameManuela
person.givenNameMatilde
person.identifier2545573
person.identifier.ciencia-id8C1D-7FC0-8460
person.identifier.ciencia-id5110-3A70-C3F3
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1256-990X
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6175-6934
person.identifier.ridN-7022-2015
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57449894700
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55485977900
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfb3cca0a-0dc9-4702-83ae-fbca6b94e1da
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8ddb200d-027c-40ca-8ca4-7e3a5981bcb1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfb3cca0a-0dc9-4702-83ae-fbca6b94e1da

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ART_Manuela Vieira da Silva.pdf
Size:
21.21 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.03 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: