| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 487.15 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
This study examines the whether or not family firms are financially healthier than non-family
in terms of capital structure and leverage. It therefore takes into consideration the existence of any
significant differences between the leverage and risk choices of family and non-family firms. Using a
panel data set of 888 firms and 7104 firm-year observations of unlisted small and medium size firms
over the period 2007–2014, we present that family owned businesses have lower financial structure
than those of non-family owned businesses. This indicates that most family firms use less debt
financing than non-family firms, and as such maintain a lower level of debt. Secondly, family firms
demonstrate lower risk as illustrated by the Altman Z-score. The Altman Z-score scale illustrates a
contrary relationship of significance with respect to family firms and their counterparts in terms of
the operation aspect of the business’s risk factors. Family firms managed their business operations
with lower risk and are generally healthier financially than their counterpart firms. Lastly, findings
from the robust tests for the hypotheses using a sample of bankrupt firms in Iberian Balance sheet
Analysis System (SABI) reveal that the proportion of failure of family firms as opposed to their
counterpart firms is relatively low. Analyzing the bankruptcy files of firms from 2002 to 2014 shows
a considerably low ratio of family firms at the 5% significant level. This affirms that the low risk
illustrated in the Altman Z-score regression is consistent to the lower ratio of family firms that were
declared bankrupted over the study period, which makes Spain an important case in this study.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Capital structure Non-family firms Risk Family firms Leverage