Repository logo
 
Publication

Biological effects and bioaccumulation of gold in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) – Nano versus ionic form

dc.contributor.authorBarreto, A.
dc.contributor.authorDias, A. A.
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, B.
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, A.
dc.contributor.authorTrindade, T.
dc.contributor.authorSoares, A. M. V. M.
dc.contributor.authorHylland, K.
dc.contributor.authorLoureiro, S.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-08T10:07:00Z
dc.date.available2021-04-08T10:07:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.description.abstractThe question of whether gold (Au) is more toxic as nanoparticles or in its ionic form remains unclear and controversial. The present work aimed to clarify the effects of 96 h exposure to 4, 80 and 1600 μg·L−1 of 7 nm gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) – (citrate coated (cAuNPs) or polyvinylpyrrolidone coated (PVP-AuNPs)) – and ionic Au (iAu) on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Effects at different levels of biological organization (behaviour, neurotransmission, biotransformation, oxidative stress/damage and genotoxicity) were assessed. cAuNPs induced oxidative stress and damage (lipid peroxidation increase), even at 4 μg·L−1, and reduced the ability of S. aurata to swim against a water flow at 1600 μg·L−1. Exposure to cAuNPs induced more adverse effects than exposure to PVP-AuNPs. All tested concentrations of Au (nano or ionic form) induced DNA breaks and cytogenetic damage in erythrocytes of S. aurata. Generally, iAu induced significantly more effects in fish than the nano form, probably associated with the significantly higher accumulation in the fish tissues. No fish mortality was observed following exposure to AuNPs, but mortality was observed in the group exposed to 1600 μg·L−1 of iAu.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationBarreto, A., Dias, A., Duarte, B., Pinto, E., Almeida, A., Trindade, T., Soares, A. M. V. M., Hylland, K., Loureiro, S., & Oliveira, M. (2020). Biological effects and bioaccumulation of gold in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) – Nano versus ionic form. Science of The Total Environment, 716, 137026. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137026pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137026pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/17806
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720305362pt_PT
dc.subjectNanotoxicitypt_PT
dc.subjectGoldpt_PT
dc.subjectMarine fishpt_PT
dc.subjectSeawaterpt_PT
dc.subjectBiomarkerspt_PT
dc.titleBiological effects and bioaccumulation of gold in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) – Nano versus ionic formpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.familyNamePinto
person.givenNameEdgar
person.identifier.ciencia-id271F-B7DF-8FAB
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8021-4783
rcaap.rightsclosedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationeaf9fc86-1a1c-437f-adee-d28040aa7f2f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryeaf9fc86-1a1c-437f-adee-d28040aa7f2f

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ART_Edgar_Pinto_3.pdf
Size:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format