Repository logo
 
Publication

Students’ reading behavior: digital vs. print preferences in portuguese context

dc.contributor.authorTerra, Ana Lúcia
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-17T15:51:28Z
dc.date.available2015-11-17T15:51:28Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to present the main Portuguese results from a multi-national study on reading format preferences and behaviors from undergraduate students from Polytechnic Institute of Porto (Portugal). For this purpose we apply an adaptation of the Academic Reading Questionnaire previously created by Mizrachi (2014). This survey instrument has 14 Likert-style statements regarding the format influence in the students reading behavior, including aspects such as ability to remember, feelings about access convenience, active engagement with the text by highlighting and annotating, and ability to review and concentrate on the text. The importance of the language and dimension of the text to determine the preference format is also inquired. Students are also asked about the electronic device they use to read digital documents. Finally, some demographic and academic data were gathered. The analysis of the results will be contextualized on a review of the literature concerning youngsters reading format preferences. The format (digital or print) in which a text is displayed and read can impact comprehension, which is an important information literacy skill. This is a quite relevant issue for class readings in academic context because it impacts learning. On the other hand, students preferences on reading formats will influence the use of library services. However, literature is not unanimous on this subject. Woody, Daniel and Baker (2010) concluded that the experience of reading is not the same in electronic or print context and that students prefer print books than e-books. This thesis is reinforced by Ji, Michaels and Waterman (2014) which report that among 101 undergraduates the large majority self-reported to read and learn more when they use printed format despite the fact that they prefer electronically supplied readings instead of those supplied in printed form. On the other side, Rockinson-Szapkiw, et al (2013) conducted a study were they demonstrate that e-textbook is as effective for learning as the traditional textbook and that students who choose e-textbook had significantly higher perceived learning than students who chose to use print textbooks.pt_PT
dc.identifier.isbn978-9949-29-241-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/6907
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherTallinn Universitypt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://ecil2015.ilconf.org/documents/ecil2015_abstracts.pdf
dc.subjectAcademic readingpt_PT
dc.subjectPrint readingpt_PT
dc.subjectDigital readingpt_PT
dc.subjectCollege studentspt_PT
dc.subjectPortugalpt_PT
dc.titleStudents’ reading behavior: digital vs. print preferences in portuguese contextpt_PT
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceTallinn, Estoniapt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage88pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleEuropean Conference on Information Literacy (ECIL), 3rdpt_PT
person.familyNameTerra
person.givenNameAna Lúcia
person.identifier.ciencia-idBF11-FB23-53A5
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1292-2849
person.identifier.ridJ-5257-2012
person.identifier.scopus-author-id36024158400
rcaap.rightsclosedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfc87ff7d-fdd6-4dd6-a60e-452fb812975d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfc87ff7d-fdd6-4dd6-a60e-452fb812975d

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
COM_AnaTerra_2015_1.pdf
Size:
2.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format