Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
903.18 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
The concept of sustainable development (SD) was introduced in the “Our Common Future”
report, launched in 1987, which influenced the emergence of many studies related to the role played
by organizations as actors supporting SD. SD is a consolidated concept; however, since 1987, many
political, social, and natural events have occurred on our planet, which have impacted companies’
behaviors. However, the diversity of research from different fields has provoked, among the academic community, a lack of clarity surrounding “sustainability” (S), “corporate sustainability” (CS)
and “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) concepts. This lack of clarity can also be identified in
companies, which have referred to “sustainability” only in the environmental field. Recently, increased discussions related to corporate sustainability metrics have shed light on the ESG criteria
(environmental, social, and governance), increasing misperceptions associated with the concept.
Ambiguous definitions and constructs may prevent managers from identifying sustainability goals
for their companies. Therefore, literature reviews as a research method are more relevant than ever.
Thus, in this work, we aim to answer the following question: How should we integrate different
perspectives on corporate sustainability, in order to broaden the understanding of the concept? In this
study, we conducted a focused bibliographic review and revisited the papers that most influenced the
construction of the concepts. The information in this paper is helpful to improve the understanding
of CS; to provide specific insights into the studies that have investigated this field; to help managers
and entrepreneurs who are improving CS actions in their companies; and to support academia by
putting together a large amount of information about this theme in one paper.
Description
Keywords
Sustainable development; Corporate social responsibility Corporate sustainability ESG