Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
150.22 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Studies were undertaken to determine the adsorption behavior of α-cypermethrin [R)-α-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl(1S)-cis-
3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, and (S)-α-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1R)-cis-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-
dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate] in solutions on granules of cork and activated carbon (GAC). The adsorption studies were carried
out using a batch equilibrium technique. A gas chromatograph with an electron capture detector (GC-ECD) was used to analyze
α-cypermethrin after solid phase extraction with C18 disks. Physical properties including real density, pore volume, surface area
and pore diameter of cork were evaluated by mercury porosimetry. Characterization of cork particles showed variations thereby
indicating the highly heterogeneous structure of the material. The average surface area of cork particles was lower than that of GAC.
Kinetics adsorption studies allowed the determination of the equilibrium time—24 hours for both cork (1–2 mm and 3–4 mm) and
GAC. For the studied α-cypermethrin concentration range, GAC revealed to be a better sorbent. However, adsorption parameters
for equilibrium concentrations, obtained through the Langmuir and Freundlich models, showed that granulated cork 1–2 mm have
the maximum amount of adsorbed α-cypermethrin (qm) (303 μg/g); followed by GAC (186 μg/g) and cork 3-4 mm (136 μg/g). The
standard deviation (SD) values, demonstrate that Freundlich model better describes the α-cypermethrin adsorption phenomena on
GAC, while α-cypermethrin adsorption on cork (1-2 mm and 3-4 mm) is better described by the Langmuir. In view of the adsorption
results obtained in this study it appears that granulated cork may be a better and a cheaper alternative to GAC for removing
α-cypermethrin from water.
Description
Keywords
Adsorption Activated carbon Cypermethrin Cork Pesticide Pyrethroid
Citation
Publisher
Taylor & Francis