Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparison of upper limb kinematics in two activities of daily living with different handling requirements

2020-08Journal article Restricted access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMesquita, Inês
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Pedro Filipe Pereira da
dc.contributor.authorBorgonovo-Santos, Márcio
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, Ana Rita
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, Miguel Velhote
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Cláudia
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-07T11:53:20Z
dc.date.available2021-12-07T11:53:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-08
dc.description.abstractRecently, kinematic analysis of the drinking task (DRINK) has been recommended to assess the quality of upper limb (UL) movement after stroke, but the accomplishment of this task may become difficult for poststroke patients with hand impairment. Therefore, it is necessary to study ADLs that involve a simpler interaction with a daily life target, such as the turning on a light task (LIGHT). As the knowledge of movement performed by healthy adults becomes essential to assess the quality of movement of poststroke patients, the main goal of this article was to compare the kinematic strategies used by healthy adults in LIGHT with those that are used in DRINK. 63 adults, aged 30 to 69 years old, drank water and turned on a light, using both ULs separately, while seated. The movements of both tasks were captured by a 3D motion capture system. End-point and joint kinematics of reaching and returning phases were analysed. A multifactorial analysis of variance with repeated measures was applied to the kinematic metrics, using age, sex, body mass index and dominance as main factors. Mean and peak velocities, index of curvature, shoulder flexion and elbow extension were lower in LIGHT, which suggests that the real hand trajectory was smaller in this task. In LIGHT, reaching was less smooth and returning was smoother than DRINK. The instant of peak velocity was similar in both tasks. There was a minimal anterior trunk displacement in LIGHT, and a greater anterior trunk displacement in DRINK. Age and sex were the main factors which exerted effect on some of the kinematics, especially in LIGHT. The different target formats and hand contact in DRINK and LIGHT seem to be responsible for differences in velocity profile, efficiency, smoothness, joint angles and trunk displacement. Results suggest that the real hand trajectory was smaller in LIGHT and that interaction with the switch seems to be less demanding than with the glass. Accordingly, LIGHT could be a good option for the assessment of poststroke patients without grasping ability. Age and sex seem to be the main factors to be considered in future studies for a better match between healthy and poststroke adults.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationMesquita, I. A., Fonseca, P. F. P. d., Borgonovo-Santos, M., Ribeiro, E., Pinheiro, A. R. V., Correia, M. V., & Silva, C. (2020). Comparison of upper limb kinematics in two activities of daily living with different handling requirements. Human Movement Science, 72, 102632. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2020.102632pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.humov.2020.102632pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn0167-9457
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/19017
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945720300361?via%3Dihubpt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectUpper extremitypt_PT
dc.subjectMotor performance assessmentpt_PT
dc.subjectKinematic analysispt_PT
dc.subjectDrinkingpt_PT
dc.subjectTurning on the lightpt_PT
dc.titleComparison of upper limb kinematics in two activities of daily living with different handling requirementspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage15pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleHuman Movement Sciencept_PT
oaire.citation.volume72pt_PT
person.familyNameMesquita
person.familyNameRibeiro
person.familyNamePinheiro
person.familyNameSilva
person.givenNameInês
person.givenNameEdgar
person.givenNameAna Rita
person.givenNameCláudia
person.identifier2061639
person.identifier.ciencia-idCB11-0C37-6894
person.identifier.ciencia-id7B16-B061-2A1C
person.identifier.ciencia-idC31B-F85B-9008
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9659-7531
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8829-9005
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4310-7652
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1484-1893
person.identifier.ridB-4018-2017
rcaap.rightsclosedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6fb6423f-87ee-439c-822c-5f0dd11c79e1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication22b9fbd9-d9c0-4ce5-90a0-d9173e0900cd
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa99bce31-2fe7-4e36-af87-32d684d22ce0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication605d47b4-c8d5-4cb6-a7c0-094120dac221
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery605d47b4-c8d5-4cb6-a7c0-094120dac221

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ART_Inês Mesquita 2.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

ESS - CIR - Artigos
ESS - CF - Artigos
ESS - FIT - Artigos