Logo do repositório

Percorrer por data de Publicação, começado por "2026-01-14"

Filtrar resultados por ano ou mês
A mostrar 1 - 2 de 2
  • Occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation: A systematic review of protective measures
    Publication . Rocha, Ricardo; Santos, Joana; Baptista, João Santos; Guedes, Joana; Carvalhais, Carlos; Alberto Alves Carvalhais, Carlos; Santos, Joana
    Solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen and poses a significant occupational hazard to outdoor workers. Despite preventive guidelines, adherence to protective measures remains inconsistent. This systematic review identified the protective measures adopted by healthy outdoor workers and assessed their adherence to and the effectiveness of these measures. Following the PRISMA 2020 statement, the review searched Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed for peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025. Eligible studies included at least 100 healthy participants and evaluated preventive or protective measures against solar UVR. Independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the McMaster Critical Review Form. From 17,756 records, 51 studies met the inclusion criteria after screening and a subsequent snowballing process. The identified protective strategies clustered into physical, behavioural, and organisational categories. Adherence ranged from low to moderate, with structured interventions and employer support improving compliance. Sunscreen use remained low due to perceived inconvenience and lack of provision. Overall, the evidence revealed substantial variability in implementation and effectiveness across occupations. Strengthened regulations and integrated interventions combining education, personal protective equipment, and organisational measures are essential. Future research should prioritise longitudinal designs and objective indicators such as biomarkers and dosimetry.
    2026-01-14Artigo de investigação Acesso aberto Ver mais
  • Dose-dependent pharmacological mechanisms within the Neuroscience-based Nomenclature: a new concept to facilitate neuroscience-based prescribing
    Publication . Zemach, Sasson; Zohar, Joseph; Correll, Christoph U.; Stahl, Stephen M.; Drago, Filippo; Goodwin, Guy M.; Moller, Hans-Jurgen; Uchida, Hiroyuki; Siafis, Spyridon; Santos, Marlene; Blier, Pierre; Santos, Marlene
    In this Personal View, we introduce the concept of different dosage different pharmacology (DDDP), which describes how certain psychotropic medications have distinct therapeutic effects at low and high doses due to differing neurobiological mechanisms. Using the Neuroscience-based Nomenclature (NbN) framework, which classifies drugs by pharmacology and modes of action, we identified ten agents demonstrating DDDP in a comprehensive expert-based consensus process: amisulpride, amitriptyline, aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, doxepin, mirtazapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and trazodone. These medications show clearly demarcated dose-dependent effects, with changes in pharmacological action. For example, some drugs show anxiolytic or hypnotic effects at low doses (via histamine H1 or noradrenergic α1 antagonism) and antidepressant effects at high doses (via reuptake inhibition of serotonin or norepinephrine). Understanding these differences supports more rational prescribing (eg, increasing dopamine partial agonist doses beyond the optimal range might reduce efficacy). DDDP, within the NbN framework, offers a neuroscience-based approach to more precise psychopharmacology.
    2026-01-14Artigo científico Acesso embargado Ver mais