Percorrer por autor "Videira, Sara"
A mostrar 1 - 3 de 3
Resultados por página
Opções de ordenação
- Contributo para o estabelecimento de níveis de referência de diagnóstico em eletrofisiologia de intervenção: estudo de um centro em PortugalPublication . Videira, Sara; Pereira, José Manuel; Pereira, José ManuelA maioria dos procedimentos eletrofisiologia de intervenção necessitam de fluoroscopia expondo à radiação ionizante todos os intervenientes. O recurso a níveis de referência de diagnóstico (NRD) pode ser uma ferramenta profícua para promover a otimização de dose. O principal objetivo deste estudo consistiu em investigar as doses de exposição, determinando os NRD.
- Estudo do Stress nos Técnicos de RadiologiaPublication . Videira, Sara; Ventura, Sandra RuaO conceito de stress nem sempre foi consensual, no entanto, vários estudos têm documentado a relevância deste no contexto das diferentes profissões. O stress parece ser particularmente importante quando aplicado aos profissionais de saúde, estes estão frequentemente propensos ao burnout, termo que descreve o estado deexaustão prolongada e diminuição de interesse, especialmente em relação ao trabalho.
- Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature reviewPublication . Videira, Sara; Rodrigues, Matilde; Silva, Manuela Vieira daThis review aims to identify and analyze the instruments employed for assessing the overall performance of workers exposed to fluoroscopy during surgical procedures and/or interventional procedures, using the PRISMA methodology. The studies were located through searches conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Lilacs, ScienceDirect, B-ON, EBSCOhost, and EBSCO Discovery Service on March 27, 2023. Additional studies were identified using backward and forward citation techniques. The PEO strategic model was followed. The search spanned studies published between 2012 and 2022. The quality of the studies underwent assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Out of the 23 studies identified, encompassing 3604 individuals, 12 (52%) addressed the reliability and/or validity of the instruments, while 3 (13%) focused on the development and psychometric testing of the instruments. Only 5 instruments (23%), validated and reliable, exclusively evaluated occupational radiological protection. The predominant dimension covered was knowledge (82%, n = 19). The population was assessed in 18 studies, pre- and post-intervention in 2 studies, and 21 studies provided recommendations or tools for improvement. Individuals in the studies utilized passive dosimeters (ranging from 5% to 98%), thyroid shields (15% to 98%), and aprons or lead skirts/coats (28% to 99%). The evidence quality was moderate (6/8). This study underscores the imperative to enhance compliance with protective and monitoring equipment. Furthermore, additional information is warranted concerning the validity and reliability of the instruments used, as well as the development of instruments that are both valid and reliable.