Browsing by Author "Moreira, F.J.P."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesivePublication . Leal, A.J.S.; Campilho, R.D.S.G.; Silva, F.J.G.; Silva, D.F.O.; Moreira, F.J.P.Cohesive zone modelling (CZM) is widely used for predicting the strength of adhesive joints. The key variable for crack path modelling is the critical strain energy release rate (GC), which can be separated into the tensile (GIC) and shear (GIIC) components. In shear, the End Notched Flexure (ENF) test is widespread. However, other test methods exist and could be a viable replacement. This work aims to make a numerical evaluation between the ENF and Four-Point End Notched Flexure (4ENF) tests to determine GIIC of a ductile adhesive (SikaForce® 7752) and to provide shear CZM laws for further application in design. An inverse technique was used to obtain the shear CZM laws of the adhesive. It was concluded that the GIIC values obtained by the ENF and 4ENF tests are in good agreement. The numerical analysis led to unique shear CZM laws for both tests, with similar results.
- Evaluation of T-joints in aluminium structures under different geometriesPublication . Moreira, F.J.P.; Campilho, R.D.S.G.; Cardoso, M.G.; Silva, Francisco J. G.The adhesive bonding technique is nowadays very popular in industrial applications, and is gradually replacing other more traditional bonding methods (fastened, welded and riveted joints) due to some advantages. However, its application supposes accurate methods for strength prediction. As a result, the techniques to predict the strength of adhesive joints has highly evolved. The eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) is a recent innovation implemented over the (Finite Element Method) FEM that enables crack growth to be modelled. However, its application to adhesive joints is still scarce. This work consists of an experimental and XFEM analysis of aluminium alloy T-joints, adhesively-bonded with three adhesive types. A parametric study is undertaken regarding the curved adherends’ thickness (tP2), with values between 1 and 4 mm. The adhesives Araldite® AV138 (strong but brittle), Araldite® 2015 (less strong but moderately ductile) and the Sikaforce® 7752 (with the smallest strength but highly ductile) were tested. A comparative analysis between the different joints conditions was undertaken by plotting peel (σу) and shear (τxy) stresses. The XFEM predictive capabilities were tested with different damage initiation criteria. It was found that, provided that the modelling conditions are properly set, accurate numerical results can be found.