Repository logo
 
Publication

Measures of cognitive reserve: an umbrella review

2023-04-19Journal article Restricted access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Joana O.
dc.contributor.authorPeixoto, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorDores, Artemisa R.
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-07T10:17:13Z
dc.date.available2023-06-07T10:17:13Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-19
dc.description.abstractRecently, there has been a growing interest in operationalizing and measuring cognitive reserve (CR) for clinical and research purposes. This umbrella review aims to summarize the existing systematic and meta-analytic reviews about measures of CR. A literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the guidelines of Aromataris et al. (Citation2015) to identify the systematic reviews and meta-analysis involving the assessment of CR. The methodological quality of the papers included in this umbrella review was assessed with A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) and Specialist Unit for Review Evidence (SURE). Thirty-one reviews were identified, sixteen of which were systematic reviews, and fifteen were meta-analyses. Most of the reviews had a critically low quality, according to AMSTAR-2. The reviews included between two and 135 studies. Most of the papers focused on older adults, mainly those with dementia. CR was measured using one to six proxies, but most considered each proxy separately. The most assessed proxies of CR were education on its own, combined with occupation and/or engagement in activities or combined with parental education, bilingualism, and engagement in activities when four CR proxies were studied. Most of the studies included in higher quality reviews focused on three proxies, with education and engagement in activities being the most evaluated using CR questionnaires. Despite the growing interest in measuring CR, its operationalization did not improve since the last umbrella review in this field.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationJoana O. Pinto, Bruno Peixoto, Artemisa R. Dores, & Fernando Barbosa. (2023). Measures of cognitive reserve: An umbrella review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, VOL. 0, Nº. 0, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2023.2200978pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13854046.2023.2200978pt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn1744-4144
dc.identifier.issn1385-4046
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/23084
dc.language.isoporpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherTaylor & Francispt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2023.2200978pt_PT
dc.subjectCognitive reservept_PT
dc.subjectUmbrella reviewpt_PT
dc.subjectPRISMApt_PT
dc.subjectAMSTAR-2pt_PT
dc.subjectSUREpt_PT
dc.titleMeasures of cognitive reserve: an umbrella reviewpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage74pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleThe Clinical Neuropsychologistpt_PT
person.familyNamePinto
person.familyNameDores
person.givenNameJoana O
person.givenNameArtemisa
person.identifier.ciencia-id431A-BDD1-63C2
person.identifier.ciencia-id6B12-301B-4A0F
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0643-8439
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4595-9816
rcaap.rightsclosedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9f253dfa-a8af-4aed-8258-8700464adcf1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6579b160-3747-4ab2-a590-9f7d03215fa7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9f253dfa-a8af-4aed-8258-8700464adcf1

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ART_Joana O. Pinto.pdf
Size:
3.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

ESS - CSH - Artigos
ESS - CIR - Artigos