| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.86 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
As tecnologias de informação e comunicação espalharam-se pelas nossas vidas para facilitar as nossas tarefas quotidianas e aumentar a qualidade da nossa existência em todos os domínios. A automatização e integração dos diferentes sistemas domésticos, assume um papel muito importante na gestão das habitações e empresas aumentando a sua autonomia, independência e autoconfiança. A “domótica” é uma tecnologia recente, apesar de estar associada a um objetivo fundamental de conforto, existem outras situações onde a domótica pode ser importante. Deteção de situações de emergência tais como incêndios ou fugas de gás ou água, ou deteção e sinalização de situações de intrusão são um exemplo daquilo que a domótica pode apoiar de uma forma muito profissional e capaz. A principal motivação desta tese de mestrado reflete o interesse em estudar e testar projetos para tornar uma habitação o mais autónoma possível. Para isso foi necessário conhecer, avaliar e perceber os vários protocolos associados à automação residencial. Percecionar quais os protocolos em fim de vida e quais os protocolos com margem de expansão. Para além disto, o objetivo principal desta dissertação passa por perceber efetivamente quais as diferenças e limitações de duas soluções de vigilância e controlo habitacional apoiadas no protocolo Z-Wave. Deste modo, neste documento são apresentados alguns dos principais protocolos de automação doméstica, as suas principais características e as vantagens e desvantagens da sua utilização. Foram desenvolvidas duas soluções baseadas no protocolo Z- Wave para uma moradia, e apresentadas as principais diferenças em termos de configuração, de interface e de utilização. Foi possível perceber que estas duas soluções são adequadas para situações diferentes. Enquanto uma é mais intuitiva e interessante para associar um sistema de vigilância, a outra é economicamente mais acessível, mais abrangente e permite realizar de igual forma a automação de uma residência. No final foi possível comprovar que efetivamente que as duas soluções são idênticas, embora com especificidades bem distintas, nomeadamente no que toca à configuração dos dispositivos do sistema e na criação de cenários.
Information and communication technologies have spread throughout our lives to facilitate our day-to-day tasks and increase the quality of our existence in all areas. The automation and integration of different home systems plays a very important role in the management of homes and businesses, increasing their autonomy, independence and self- confidence. "Domotic” is a recent technology, although associated with a fundamental goal of comfort, there are other situations where home automation can be important. Detection of emergency situations such as fires or leaks of gas or water, or detection and signaling of intrusion situations are an example of what home automation can support in a very professional and capable way. The main motivation of this master's thesis reflects the interest in studying and testing projects to make a home as autonomous as possible. For this it was necessary to know, evaluate and understand the multiples protocols associated with home automation. Understand which protocols are in end of life and which protocols with expansion margin. In addition, the main objective of this dissertation is to understand effectively the differences and limitations of two surveillance and housing control solutions supported by the Z-Wave protocol. In this way, this document presents some of the main protocols of home automation, namely those with which there was more contact, the main characteristics and the advantages and disadvantages of its use. Two solutions based on the Z-Wave protocol for a home were developed, and the main differences in terms of configuration, interface and use were presented. It was possible to realize that these two solutions are suitable for different situations. While one is more intuitive and interesting to associate with a surveillance system, the other is more affordable, more comprehensive and allows for the same automation of a home In the end it was possible to prove that effectively that the two solutions are identical, although with very distinct specificities, namely with regard to the configuration of system devices and the creation of scenarios.
Information and communication technologies have spread throughout our lives to facilitate our day-to-day tasks and increase the quality of our existence in all areas. The automation and integration of different home systems plays a very important role in the management of homes and businesses, increasing their autonomy, independence and self- confidence. "Domotic” is a recent technology, although associated with a fundamental goal of comfort, there are other situations where home automation can be important. Detection of emergency situations such as fires or leaks of gas or water, or detection and signaling of intrusion situations are an example of what home automation can support in a very professional and capable way. The main motivation of this master's thesis reflects the interest in studying and testing projects to make a home as autonomous as possible. For this it was necessary to know, evaluate and understand the multiples protocols associated with home automation. Understand which protocols are in end of life and which protocols with expansion margin. In addition, the main objective of this dissertation is to understand effectively the differences and limitations of two surveillance and housing control solutions supported by the Z-Wave protocol. In this way, this document presents some of the main protocols of home automation, namely those with which there was more contact, the main characteristics and the advantages and disadvantages of its use. Two solutions based on the Z-Wave protocol for a home were developed, and the main differences in terms of configuration, interface and use were presented. It was possible to realize that these two solutions are suitable for different situations. While one is more intuitive and interesting to associate with a surveillance system, the other is more affordable, more comprehensive and allows for the same automation of a home In the end it was possible to prove that effectively that the two solutions are identical, although with very distinct specificities, namely with regard to the configuration of system devices and the creation of scenarios.
Description
Keywords
Domótica Automação Doméstica Protocolos Z-Wave Vigilância, Sensores Controladores Home Automation Protocols Z-Wave Surveillance Sensors, Controllers